Request a Quote

Request a Quote

Please complete the form below, we’d love to hear from you!

Federations - Unfunded work revisited

  • 8th October 2015

Federations - Unfunded work revisited

"In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins, not through strength but by perseverance." H. Jackson Brown, Author

You may recall a post back in July where I looked at the ‘custom and practice’ of General Practice picking up work that is not funded; or perhaps more accurately work dumped on them by the local hospital, or work not commissioned by the CCG, yet practices are still expected to do the work for free. 

Sometimes a CCG commissions and pays some of its practices to undertake work, but not others, and those practices not commissioned are expected to do the work for free. I also highlighted the excellent advice from the BMA which many of the federations we work with are now following. 

As I highlighted back in July it is ‘custom and practice’ for General Practice to provide work free of charge, which consumes just as much time and practice resource as funded work. This comes at the same time as practices are being challenged nationally by the whole health economy for not offering better access. 

The arguments and discussion about the subject are ongoing, including an article in PULSE from Dr Zoe Norris about the topic:

For me the article is spot on, and demonstrates a very clear solution: a hospital subcontracts the work it cannot or does not want to provide, properly resourced, back to General Practice, through a federation or another provider organisation that can deliver the work at scale. This ensures that the hospital has only one contract to manage, and at a stroke will resolve the issue.

What I’m arguing is that if the work that clearly should attract a fee was properly funded, via a subcontract based on a percentage of the PbR (Payment by Results) Tariff price paid to the hospital, the Practices would absorb many of the items that cannot have a price put on them without question.

Both parties win:

The workload is properly funded, meaning practices can pay staff to deliver the work, which helps stabilise practice income and keep’s it viable.

The hospital wins as the workload is no longer with them, but is more cost effectively delivered by the practices, while they retain a percentage of the tariff.

Of course the CCG could simply commission directly with the practices; however, in 209 CCGs I have yet to see this happen, meaning the quicker and easier solution is for the providers to sort it out between themselves.

Or we can of course continue as we are – at loggerheads!

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."

Albert Einstein

If you are thinking about federating, and would like more information on how BW Medical Accountants can support you in forming a federation, or to arrange to speak to one of our experts please contact or call 0191 653 1022.

Additionally, if you should have questions for us please email and we will do our best to answer these within the blog.

Who writes this?

Scott Mckenzie

Scott Mckenzie

NHS Management Consultant
Find out more about Scott
  • Very smooth changeover to BW, with good communication at all times. Very efficient in the production of the accounts (as promised) and the Partners are delighted with the advice received to date.

    Practice Manager
  • BW Medical Accountants have a good working knowledge of General Practice and are keenly aware of the challenges Practices face within the changing environment of the NHS.  Benfield Park have been very impressed by the way BW Medical continue to deliver the range of services they provide from Accounts to Tax and NHS Pension advice. 

    We have found Practice consultation and engagement from BW Medical specifically helpful to shape the future of the Practice.

    Senior Partner
    Benfield Park Medical Group, Newcastle
  • We had no hesitation in moving to BW Medical Accountants.  For any business your accountant is integral, and for us one of the most important factors to this relationship is to have a personal and trusting approach, which BW have undoubtedly achieved. 

    The service we receive and the interest they show in our practice assures us that they have a genuine interest in us and commitment to us.  More importantly they are always helpful and polite to answer even the dumbest of questions!  They give us confidence and reassurance knowing that they are always very up-to-date with all the numerous changes within general practice and we would have no hesitation in recommending them to other practices seeking a professional and personal accountancy service.

    Jackie Rotherham, Practice Manager
    The James Street Family Practice, Lincolnshire
  • We moved to BW Medical Accountants in 2013 and we are delighted that we have.  Having been in the same business for over 20 years it is important to have a relationship with the accountancy team but most importantly you need to have trust.  We made the decision to move our business to BW Medical Accountants and having worked with the Team especially Tina we are very satisfied.  Tina going through the accounts brought to our attention many things that I was not aware of in the past.  The first years' experience can only be described as excellent.

    Customer service is first and foremost with BW and this shines through as each and every one of them are approachable, helpful and most importantly understand and know the business.  General practice is complex and is going to get more complex in the coming years.  We need Accountants who truly understand our business. We as a practice and as individuals would certainly recommend BW Medical Accountants.

    Gloria Middleton, Managing Partner
    Westbourne Medical Group, Sunderland
  • We changed to BW Medical Accountants and I would say we have just had the most transparent and understandable end of year meeting and the best planning advice I have ever had in 16 years of practice.

    GP Partner

Newsletter Signup